An article that brings much excitement within the Madi and the legendary clear PEJE TRAIL
By Victor Hernández
March 25, 2009 - 00:00
March 2003. Shortly after the start of the Iraq war, the U.S. government prohibits American reporters taking photos of coffins of soldiers killed in the Middle East. The right argues that censorship on the grounds that releasing those photos would help "the enemy." The ban was removed in 2009, shortly after Obama takes office as President.
July 2004. Sergeant Joe Roche, United States Army, writes the following about Michael Moore documentary, Fahrenheit 9 / 11:
"Michael Moore's film, Fahrenheit 9 / 11, we are seeing here on the bases (military ) of the United States in Kuwait. Some soldiers have received and are already happening between them. The impact is devastating. Here we are, soldiers of the First Armored Division, just a few days to finally return home after a year serving in Iraq, and Moore's film is shocking and overwhelming for the soldiers, making them feel ashamed. Moore has abused the First Amendment and is hurting worse than it did the enemy. "
The First Amendment is an amendment to the United States Constitution guarantees the right to freedom of expression. Similar attacks critics George W Bush and the Republicans have been made by various right-wing columnists in the United States. invariably appears the expression "abuse of the First Amendment" or "abuse of freedom of expression." For Republicans to criticize the right to abuse the right to freedom of expression.
March 24, 2009. The right-wing historian Enrique Krauze, writes in the New York Times:
"Our print media (in Mexico) have gone beyond the necessary and legitimate provision of information to continuously release photographs of the most egregious the war on drugs, a practice that some feel that borders on a pornography of violence. Photos in the press of horrors like severed heads provide free advertising for the drug cartels. This also helps to advance their cause when you feel ordinary Mexicans que realmente son parte de un 'estado fallido'".
El ataque de Krauze al ejercicio de la libertad de expresión en la prensa mexicana aparece en una columna de opinión en la que pretende justificar al gobierno panista y negar lo que todo el mundo ve: que México es un estado fallido.
Este es el mismo Enrique Krauze que, en aras de la "libertad de expresión", firmó junto con otros "intelectuales" de derecha un amparo contra la reforma electoral con el propósito de que particulares puedan contratar espacio en radio y televisión para transmitir spots de contenido político, práctica que usó la COPARMEX y el CCE para hacer guerra sucia contra Andrés Manuel López Obrador.
Krauze
himself also published a magazine called "Letras Libres" containing pages of official propaganda paths of the Calderon. Krauze
same now takes allegations similar to those used by the ultra-right in the U.S. to attack those who criticized the Iraq war and the abuses of the regime of George W Bush, but to defend the indefensible: a failed state headed by the PAN.
Fascism "or hypocrisy? Let the public decide. Other inconsistencies
Krauze and right:
1. Krauze argues in the NYT that the entrepreneurial class in Mexico will not go to Miami. He did not say is that Alejandro Junco, the owner of the journal which publishes Krauze, Reforma, Mexico itself went last year to escape the insecurity. No to Miami, but Texas. And so many Mexican entrepreneurs are doing and fled to California and Texas for fear of insecurity in the country's government "firm hand." That kind of convenient omissions distort reality. Thus we need to Krauze's not bad distort reality if it benefits Calderon, but it is wrong to show it as is - with pictures of violence against drugs - if it hurts.
2. When the New York Times published a note in which he claimed that the popularity of Andrés Manuel López Obrador grew thanks to the ineptitude Calderon, the cartoonist on the right, Paco Calderón made a carton in which he compared to NTY with a sinking ship. Will he return to make that comparison now that his friend Enrique Krauze used to attempt to justify NYT Calderon?
3. If Andrés Manuel López Obrador would have suggested not to show images of violence in the City when he was prime minister had said what about Enrique Krauze? Have you been accused of being dictatorial and intolerant?
4. I do not remember Enrique Krauze has complained in 2007 when Mexican television repeated again and again, a pretty graphic video of a pedestrian in Mexico City falling from a footbridge. The difference between that video and pictures of violence against drugs is that the video of the passer-by on the pedestrian bridge was used to hit in the media Marcelo Ebrard.
PS: The phone message today:
again increased unemployment. I will not vote for the PAN or the PRI. Forwards.
PD2: Who Krauze using arguments to convince the Republicans in an editorial on NYT? What the Democrats have just oust the Republicans? Or the Republicans Rick Perry, governor of Texas, which asked them to send National Guard troops to the border by drug violence in Mexico? Frankly Krauze was naive, if not desperate.
0 comments:
Post a Comment